+44 (0)20 7353 2484 clerks@falcon-chambers.com

Emily Windsor

Called 1995

Emily Windsor

Emily Windsor specialises in all aspects of property litigation, with particular emphasis on commercial property disputes and agriculture. She has extensive litigation experience at all levels and in the past few years has appeared in cases concerning restrictive covenants, easements, adverse possession, proprietary estoppel, rectification, break clauses, development agreements, rent review, nuisance and agricultural holdings. Emily also has experience of personal and corporate insolvency litigation.

  • Education
    • Worcester College, Oxford: BA Jurisprudence (1993) 
    • Université Panthéon - Assas (Paris II): DSU European Law (1994). Rotary International Foundation Scholar.
  • Professional
    • Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators since 2014
    • Gray's Inn Steen Scholarship
    • Member of the Agricultural Law Association Committee 1997-1999
    • Elected member of the Bar Council 2000-2005 
    • Chairman of the Young Barristers' Committee of the Bar Council 2002
    • Elected member of the Chancery Bar Association Committee 2003-2006
    • Member of the Bar Council's Bar Standards Board 2006-2016
    • Chairman of the BSB's Diversity Committee 2007-2009
    • Joint Vice-Chairman of the BSB's Education and Training Committee 2007-2016 
    • Chairman of Taxation Disciplinary Board Disciplinary Panels 2008-2010
  • Recent Cases
    • Chipp-Marshall v Coombes (2024) HHJ Walsh (whether title to land had been acquired by adverse possession or estoppel, and whether it had been wrongly registered at HM Land Registry)
    • Maitland Court v Gulshan (2024) HHJ Evans-Gordon (whether a landowner was entitled to maintain a locked gate against the holder of an easement)
    • Griffith v Roberts (2022) Mold District Registry, KBD (whether title to land had been acquired by adverse possession; and writs of restitution) 
    • Liddiment v Hull [2021] EWHC 3418 (Ch) (appeal against a possession order made in favour of receivers)
    • Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd [2020] UKSC 45 (application to discharge or modify restrictive covenant - whether restriction "contrary to the public interest").
    • M&P Enterprises v Norfolk Square [2018] EWHC 2665 (Ch) (whether judge's conduct of a trial was unfair and/or would have led a fair-minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility of bias).
    • Walby v Walby [2013] 1 EGLR 111 (No grounds on which to imply into a transfer of part of farming land and buildings an easement of drainage in favour of the retained land). 
    • Ashdale Land and Property Co Ltd v Maioriello [2012] 2 EGLR 119 (excessive user of easements)
    • Alford v Hannaford [2011] EWCA Civ 1099 (CA) (extent of easements over farmland)
    • National Westminster Bank plc v Hunter [2011] EWHC 3170 (Ch) (enforcement of agricultural charges)
    • Rahamim v Reich [2009] ChD (exemplary damages and debarring orders)
    • Majorstake Ltd v Curtis [2008] UKHL 10 (opposition to enfranchisement on redevelopment grounds and statutory construction).
    • Hopper v Hopper [2008] EWHC 228 (proprietary estoppel)
    • Thomson v Church Commissioners for England [2006] 3 EGLR 1 (succession under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986)
    • Faircare Investments Ltd v Earlrose Golf and Leisure Ltd [2006] PLSCS 44 (registered title and agency)
    • Shephard v Turner [2006] 2EGLR 73 (restrictive covenants)
    • Monella v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd [2004] 1 EGLR 43 (rent review)
    • Owen v. Blathwayt [2003] 1 P&CR (grazing rights over common land) 
    • Yenula Properties Ltd v Naidu [2002] 3 EGLR 28 (service of notices and agency)
    • State Bank of New South Wales v. Harrison [2002] EWCA Civ 363 (courts' powers to stay orders for possession of mortgaged property)
    • Blackburn v David Alston (Suffolk) Ltd [2001] PLSCS 263 (restrictive covenants and estoppel)
    • Essex Furniture plc v National Provident Institution [2001] L&TR 3 (forfeiture by peaceable re-entry during tenant's insolvency)
    • Scotch Whisky Association v Glen Kella Distillers (No.2) Times Law Reports April 1, 1997 (intellectual property and the European definition of "whisky")
    • Harries v Barclays Bank plc [1997] 2 EGLR 15 (mortgages and milk quotas, the position of non-active quota holders and the European definition of "producer"). 
  • Publications
    • General Editor, Muir Watt & Moss: Agricultural Holdings, 16th edition, Sweet &  Maxwell 2024

    • General Editor, Muir Watt & Moss: Agricultural Holdings, 15th edition, Sweet &  Maxwell 2018

    • Bullen & Leake & Jacob's Precedents of Pleadings (14th ed.) (Contributing Editor - Property Section)

    • Woodfall Bulletin (Joint Editor).
"Emily Windsor has a practice which spans all facets of property litigation, including agricultural land disputes, and has particular experience with regard to development agreements and rent review."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Real Estate Litigation)
"Emily demonstrates an excellent knowledge of the areas of law involved in each case and is a highly skilled property law barrister."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Real Estate Litigation)
"Emily gives excellent property law advice."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Real Estate Litigation)
"Emily Windsor has a focused expertise in agricultural property law. In particular, Emily has experience in tenancy disputes and agricultural land disputes. She has also been involved in a number of cases regarding restrictive covenants."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Agriculture & Rural Affairs)
"She is incredibly personable and gets on well with clients, but she's also a formidable advocate. She doesn't pull her punches."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Agriculture & Rural Affairs)
"She is happy to explain the options but also give a clear view and advise the client on the recommended way forward. Emily is an effective advocate and very approachable with lay clients."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2025 (Agriculture & Rural Affairs)
"A formidable opponent and highly effective advocate."Legal 500 UK Bar Guide 2025
"Her arguments are carefully delivered without unnecessary complication or hyperbole."Legal 500 UK Bar Guide 2025
"Emily Windsor has a huge range of knowledge and depth in all areas of agriculture and rural affairs law."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2024 (Agriculture and Rural Affairs)
"Emily is a tenacious advocate."Chambers and Partners UK Guide 2024 (Agriculture and Rural Affairs)
"Emily provides very sensible advice in a client-friendly manner and with a view to the client's particular circumstances. She is also excellent at providing good advice on navigating complex issues."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2024 (Real Estate Litigation)
"Highly reliable, clients love her and she is very accessible."Chambers and Partners UK Bar Guide 2024 (Real Estate Litigation)
'Emily brings a KC’s intellectual analysis to legal problems, but also has an excellent client handling manner that leaves the client and instructing solicitor in no doubt that she is absolutely on board and prepared to fight the client’s case.’legal 500 UK Bar Guide 2024 (Property Litigation)
'Emily's advice shows a deep understanding of commercial issues, and she sets out useful and pragmatic solutions.’legal 500 UK Bar Guide 2024 (Agriculture)
More published comments

A Member of:

Falcon Chambers Arbitration